Nikolo
Ugreshky monastery is not mentioned in either my Russia guidebook, or
my Moscow guidebook, I found out about its existence on social media.
Wikipedia
tells me the monastery has a history dating at least as far back as
1521, though not in its current form. Over the centuries various
parts of the monastery were destroyed and rebuilt, depending on the
political situation of the time. During communism the grounds became
a child labor colony, then a labor colony in general.
When everything was handed back to the church in 1991 most of it had fallen into disrepair. The church put everything back together, and added a seminary to the complex.
When everything was handed back to the church in 1991 most of it had fallen into disrepair. The church put everything back together, and added a seminary to the complex.
The
monastery is about 30 kilometers from Moscow, it took me
approximately 90 minutes to get there. I had to take two different
metro lines, then a suburban bus for a while. The bus was perfect
because the drop off point was directly across the street from the
monastery.
The
monastery is surrounded by a brick wall, most of what I could see of
the wall was painted white. There were towers of various shapes at
what seemed to be random distances along the wall, I assume these
were originally built when the complex was also a fortress protecting
the approach to the city of Moscow.
I
entered through a gate going under one of these towers, and followed
the path to the center of the grounds.
There is a bell tower in the middle of the complex, it was separate from the main church. I'm used to seeing bell towers in the walls of monasteries, it was nice to see something different. I'm not sure, but I don't think visitors can climb up, but how fun would that be?
There is a bell tower in the middle of the complex, it was separate from the main church. I'm used to seeing bell towers in the walls of monasteries, it was nice to see something different. I'm not sure, but I don't think visitors can climb up, but how fun would that be?
I
worked my way around, and found the front steps of the main church.
The Assumption Cathedral is considerably newer than much of the
monastery, it was built between 1880 and 1894.
The outside of the church and the front steps were not particularly eye catching, at least not any more than any of the other churches I've seen all around the country. The onion domes were a little different in that one was a different colour (gold,) from the others. With the gray sky, anything with colour is noticeable.
The outside of the church and the front steps were not particularly eye catching, at least not any more than any of the other churches I've seen all around the country. The onion domes were a little different in that one was a different colour (gold,) from the others. With the gray sky, anything with colour is noticeable.
The
inside of the church was really impressive. The iconostasis is gold,
and very bright. The ceiling is high, the sanctuary (is that what
it's called in an Orthodox church?) felt airy and open. All of the
walls and ceiling areas were painted, and were absolutely lovely. As
is my habit, I spent half my time wandering around looking straight
up. The artists who paint the ceilings of churches must have permanents cricks in their necks, but I'd say it's totally worth it.
After
leaving the church I walked around the rest of the grounds, ending
near the pond. Most of the pond was frozen (at least the top of the
water was frozen,) but the area that was still open was filled with
ducks swimming back and forth.
Another
lovely walkabout Wednesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment